JOSEPH WILKS
I would like to thank Noelene Goodwin for the following: On the
evening of 19th November 1830 someone broke into the dwelling house of Henry
Marley (currier and shopkeeper) of
Ann Street in the Parish of St. Philip & St. Jacob.
Joseph Wilkes appeared in Court at Joseph Wilks' mother Mary Ann had a
firm belief in her son's innocence and so engaged the services of Francis Nixon
a solicitor of Bristol in the hope of preventing his death sentence being
carried out. In the first of
several letters to be exchanged between solicitor Francis Nixon and His Lordship
Viscount Melbourne of Whitehall it is claimed that two boys by the name of
Bordewick and Hallard were concerned in the robbery for which Joseph Wilks had
been tried. The letter dated 20th
April, 1831 claims that' Wilks is really innocent of the crime laid to his charge, he having been falsely
sworn to as the lad committing the robbery, but which from being unable to
employ a professional man to defend him, he was unable to substantiate at his
trial. Between
the months of May and August many letters were written by Francis Nixon to
Viscount Melbourne asking for his intervention in the transportation order
against Joseph including one which states Joseph's mother is with Mr. Nixon
twice a day to ascertain whether he had heard from Viscount Melbourne.
It is not until September 13th 1831, 10 months after the robbery had been
committed that we read an Affidavit from one Letetia Watkins living at
Gloucester Lane in the Parish of St. Philip and St. Jacob, who after the usual
legal preamble states: (Joseph Wilks) was to her certain knowledge in his bed at the time of the said
robbing was sworn to have been committed, this deponent (Letitia Watkins) having
on the night of the 17th day of the said month of November now last past slept
in the same room with the said Joseph Wilks from 10 o clock on that night up to
8 o clock on the following morning.” Regardless of the affidavit and the repeated pleas for clemency from his Mother,
Joseph was not acquitted of his crime but an appeal to the King resulted in the
Death sentence being commuted to transportation to Van Diemen's Land for 14
years per the vessel ' A list of transportees from Gloucestershire to Australia during the period
1783-1842 list Joseph Wilkes as a 17 year old youth in 1831 (i.e. born 1814),
from the parish of St. Philip & St. Jacob in Bristol.
Upon his arrival in This lack of accuracy makes for difficulties when trying to trace Joseph's year
and place of birth. Efforts
were made by the Bristol Record Office to check the Parish registers of St.
Phillip & St. Jacob but no reference was found to the Wilkes or Wilks
family. Although Joseph was
not expected to appear on the 1841 Census as he had by that time been
transported to VDL, the Census film was looked at on the off-chance that his
mother MaryAnn and brother William could have been traced, but the film was of
such poor quality that it made identification almost impossible.
Brother William and his 2nd wife Caroline appear on the 1851 Census for
St. Phillip & St. Jacob living at The convict transport ship ' During the voyage the convicts were managed by Surgeon William Martin in such a
way as to enforce regularity, cleanliness and ventilation to prevent any
unnecessary exposure to the sun within the tropics or to the inclemency of the
weather elsewhere. The
convicts were formed into three divisions which every morning were brought on
deck, in turn, to store their beds, wash and clean themselves.
They were brought up immediately after breakfast and kept on deck till
their quarters had been reported clean and had been inspected. The division were
then sent below, one at a time in 2 hourly shifts until 4 o'clock when the whole
were brought up and the prison well swept and ventilated.
At sunset they were sent down for the night.
The ship's Journal, which was routinely kept by the Surgeon-in-Charge of
each convict transport ship, lists only 4 cases requiring medical attention
during the journey of 119 days. Upon his arrival in Van Diemen's Land Joseph was described as standing 5'4¾",
having fair complexion, reddish brown hair, hazel eyes, a long pointed nose,
projecting upper lips, with a woman tattooed above his arm.
As the tattoo was not present when he was examined at Gloucester Gaol we
can assume that when boredom became too much for the transportees, someone was
always available to practice their 'artwork'.
Joseph's first brush with authority in his new environment was in March
1833 when his Convict Indent reports 'misconduct in passing himself off as a
Constable' for which he received a sentence feared by most convicts:
5 days on the tread wheel. It
has been suggested that the tread wheel was introduced into the colony's
punishment system as a means of having troublesome prisoners contribute towards
their keep by grinding produce when the wind was not blowing.
The tread wheel was similar to a waterwheel.
It was forty feet long with wooden treads that measured only nine inches
deep. It could accommodate up
to 50 prisoners at a time. They
would hold to a fixed handrail as the wheel ceaselessly turned.
Convicts referred to it as 'the everlasting staircase' , a label which
evokes the mind-numbing monotony of the punishment far better than any lifeless
description could. However
Joseph's life is full of contradictions.
How believable is the story repeated by one of Joseph's great
grandaughters 150 years after this brush with the law, that he was a policeman
on his arrival in the colony. In May of the same year Joe was charged with 'neglect of duty'.
By May of 1834 he appears to have been assigned to Dr. Russell where he
was charged with disobedience of orders and reprimanded.
July 1834 sees him, still assigned to Dr. Russell, charged with 'stealing
his Masters horse, impudence, disobedience of orders, and neglect of duty' for
which he was sentenced to a Road Party for 2 months.
Twelve months later he was again in trouble serving 18 months hard labor
in chains for insubordination. The
last entry in Joseph's convict record is a sentence of 7 days on the tread wheel
for disorderly conduct in church on 27th June 1836.
It was to be 5 years before he no longer rebelled under the strict,
authoritarian management of the colony and received a Conditional Pardon..
In 1839 he married Betsey Carpenter who had also been transported. At the time of his marriage on 27th March 1839, Joseph Wilkes was still stating
his occupation as that of 'labourer'.
In 1840 and 1841 the registrations of 2 children state Joseph was a
'Cook' but by the time of the birth of his next recorded child in 1843, he
stated his occupation was that of a 'dealer', an occupation he was to follow
until his death. There are 14 children recorded as being born to Joseph and Elizabeth (as Betsey became known) Wilkes
|
Please note that there might be information from other websites or brochures "reprinted" here- under the laws of "fair use". In every instance -we hope- we have provided a direct link to the owners web site. We do not claim rights or ownership to any of their information. We do thank them sincerely for their efforts. We have in every instance made a good faith effort to contact and request 'reprint' permission. Nonetheless, we do want to be certain that nothing gets lost due to web site disappearance and the like, so it appears duplicated here. Gravesites Of Tasmania, Honouring the past, building understanding. Copyright © 2011 Graves of Tasmania |